Grumpy Cat said: »
Have you ever played a shmup akson?
Overwatch
Overwatch
Looking for some but assume not. Aint played a FPS game since Turok on N64 and mainly stick w/ 3rd Person MGS and GoW taking "cover" gaming. I dont like Halo nor Destiny style. If Overwatch didnt have PLD, NIN, RNG, WHM job classes I'd hate it as well. I consider Reaper DRK and Zenyatta RDM and Lucio BRD lol
YouTube Video Placeholder
This is a shmup. Short for Shoot Em Up.
This is why when you say things like flashy and distracting lights, I am just like wat, Overwatch even has that?
[+]
I see. In OW the flashing lights of specials and even normal attacks is absolutely blinding to the point where visibility at times is literally 0%. Other games have special effects but instead use them in other locations like dust following a grenade going off instead and other explosions w/ blood effects replacing bright lights. OW is nothing but flashing lights replacing blood w/ zero special effects in other areas. It's just all wrong imo. Visibility should be 100% 24/7
When I realized that Red Skull was further negating visibility I wanted change. Not to mention my team mates make better walls than windows.
Blizzard gave options for the Color Blind. They need some options for flashy bright lights throwing ppl into siezures.
Maybe I'll make IM HAVING SIEZURES thread on OF lmfao >_>
When I realized that Red Skull was further negating visibility I wanted change. Not to mention my team mates make better walls than windows.
Blizzard gave options for the Color Blind. They need some options for flashy bright lights throwing ppl into siezures.
Maybe I'll make IM HAVING SIEZURES thread on OF lmfao >_>
I have none of the issues you describe
[+]
honestly dont think overwatch is too heavy on particles. it is normal i believe.
try looking at battleborn gameplay. lol
can we really leave this topic now? point is moot and idea is just an opinion.
can we focus on OW Olimpics and Lucio Ball?
it plays a lot like Rocket League, kinda full too.
shitty that the even skins can only be obtained via loot box and not bought via credits.
try looking at battleborn gameplay. lol
can we really leave this topic now? point is moot and idea is just an opinion.
can we focus on OW Olimpics and Lucio Ball?
it plays a lot like Rocket League, kinda full too.
shitty that the even skins can only be obtained via loot box and not bought via credits.
Bismarck.Misao said: »
focus on OW Olimpics... skins can only be obtained via loot box and not bought via credits.
sub is a bad idea anyways
Bismarck.Misao said: »
sub is a bad idea anyways
Diablo 3 , Heartstone and Heroes of the Storm are F2P (or buy once in D3 case) and get constant updates and addesd content so why not.
Sombra in the works, and atleast 2 maps hinted in future content, and no stupid season pass needed.p
Sombra in the works, and atleast 2 maps hinted in future content, and no stupid season pass needed.p
Bismarck.Misao said: »
Diablo 3 , Heartstone and Heroes of the Storm are F2P (or buy once in D3 case) and get constant updates and addesd content so why not.
Sombra in the works, and atleast 2 maps hinted in future content, and no stupid season pass needed.p
Sombra in the works, and atleast 2 maps hinted in future content, and no stupid season pass needed.p
WoW with monthly, some you buy and get to play for free, some have microtransactions
What do you think Reaper listens to more, Korn or Linkin Park?
Bismarck.Dracondria said: »
Holy ***the money pot that Hearthstone is.
Once you have your card assets and effects done, just change the pictures and numbers and you are done graphically. Then you just gotta program in card effects and boom update. Give us your money for card packs whales.
[+]
Bullet for My Valentine
You know who would LOVE for Overwatch to switch to sub base?
Riot Games.
Riot Games.
Just think Ovetwatch w/ m+kb on console for a sec. Even if I was to spend money on a gaming rig. The chances of me being at a disadvantage hardware wise are huge on PC. Im playing 1080p 60fps while some guy is all out 4k resolution 160+fps slaughtering me. Even if I had a gaming rig I would still want m+kb support on console cuz it's by far the best place to play if you want everyone on a fair level hardware wise.
Valefor.Prothescar said: »
cross platform (Console <-> PC) play is also a horrible idea since PC has other advantages compared to console (higher framerate for one). would never work, it's better to just look at overwatch on console and PC as two versions of the same game: console is a bit slower paced, PC a little bit faster
[+]
If I could I would be playing 160+fps 4k resolution. I looked at pricing and read like $3500 >< If I spend $1200 I'll get my m+kb support while only being slightly better than PS4 but I will get totally stomped by better hardware players. So... yeah I go to OF instead creating ways for Blizzard to make Overwatch better.
Those 2 Korn but I think he's more Meshuggah or White/Rob Zombie than anything
Grumpy Cat said: »
What do you think Reaper listens to more, Korn or Linkin Park?
no ultracompetetive player in their right mind is going to play at 4k. will be 1080p 144Hz monitor with a 1080 or something. A 1070 is probably even enough for 144+ FPS on OW, I haven't tried downscaling
[+]
Valefor.Prothescar said: »
no ultracompetetive player in their right mind is going to play at 4k. will be 1080p 144Hz monitor with a 1080 or something.
I was about to point out that Seagull I beleive plays at 1080p with all the settings turned down.
Siren.Akson said: »
If I could I would be playing 160+fps 4k resolution. I looked at pricing and read like $3500 >< If I spend $1200 I'll get my m+kb support while only being slightly better than PS4 but I will get totally stomped by better hardware players. So... yeah I go to OF instead creating ways for Blizzard to make Overwatch better.
You could always become a sponsored player. Unless you are actually just ***tier and blaming your shortcomings on console not having KB/M and other people having better computers.
[+]
Valefor.Prothescar said: »
no ultracompetetive player in their right mind is going to play at 4k. will be 1080p 144Hz monitor with a 1080 or something.
http://www.logicalincrements.com/games/overwatch
Siren.Akson said: »
Valefor.Prothescar said: »
no ultracompetetive player in their right mind is going to play at 4k. will be 1080p 144Hz monitor with a 1080 or something.
http://www.logicalincrements.com/games/overwatch
It offers it but it isn't the optimal way to play.
It is like playing Dark Souls at 60 FPS instead of 30. ***gets bad real quick.
Grumpy Cat said: »
You could always become a sponsored player. Unless you are actually just ***tier and blaming your shortcomings on console not having KB/M and other people having better computers.
I use a 670GTX currently and play with 160+ fps.
I also use low settings though and even when I get my newer PC with dual 1080s I'm still going to use low settings for Overwatch for one simple reason.
Low settings removes a lot of foliage (trees, brush, etc.) that can either obstruct your view or downright hide things like a torb turret, symettra turrets, a genji trying to be sneaky, etc. Illios: Ruins, Hollywood, Dorado, etc. all have reduced *** that can help hide an enemy.
I also use low settings though and even when I get my newer PC with dual 1080s I'm still going to use low settings for Overwatch for one simple reason.
Low settings removes a lot of foliage (trees, brush, etc.) that can either obstruct your view or downright hide things like a torb turret, symettra turrets, a genji trying to be sneaky, etc. Illios: Ruins, Hollywood, Dorado, etc. all have reduced *** that can help hide an enemy.
Maybe.....
I could handle that
YouTube Video Placeholder
I could handle that
Grumpy Cat said: »
What do you think Reaper listens to more, Korn or Linkin Park?
BYE BYE BYE... ill take my leave now...
[+]
Fan made character (I think)
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.