Corona Virus, How Has It Affected Your Area So Far?

You're visible anger and shaming language only go to show your cognitive dissonance. Flu season is over, nobody is sick. Time to reopen the economy because they can't pretend people are sick anymore. Let me know how quarantine in 2021 is while i'm eating Chinese food at the China Wok next week. Say it with me kid, NOTHINGBURGER

Seems you really can't read, your boyfriend brought this up as his argument for republicans being against reopening the economy but as i showed, its based on two random polls that can't be proven or sourced lol, its facts I don't like literally looking at you in the face and you think you're having a "ah ha!" moment lol

ok nausi.

Also, yes, every poll tells us how its performed, and the poll you posted is no different. Again, I'll copypaste for you.

Interviewed Online, you just proved my point. Text book unprovable claim, jesus its like you're trying to show us how much you don't think

Look up the 65000 people in Italy who were on HQC for Lupus and Arthritis. Of all of them, only 20 people contracted SARS-Cov2. None of them ended up in the ICU. Compared to the rest of the population, that's a 90% reduction.
And in 2017, the WHO published a paper on HQC said that although HQC does change your heartbeat and that could be risky, hundreds of millions of doses of that drug have been administered since it was invented and not one person has ever died of heart issues from taking the drug.
Therefore it's safe and effective. But Trump talked about it, so now the WHO and CDC are saying it's bad for your heart and ineffective. All the studies that showed HQC worked for SARS-Cov2 also included Zinc. All the "studies" being performed now in the USA are omitting the use of zinc and claiming the drug doesn't work.

And again.... not how that works, as i stated earlier. Youre drawing conclusions from a lack of valuable information, and also not understanding how the drug itself works, or how it could potentially be useful.

It's kinda funny, because the actual spreadsheet provided by the CDC has reported P&I deaths at roughly the same, or higher, than the last half decade or so.

2018 being an exception as it was a particularly nasty P&I season.

So, nice cherry picked graph to fit your personal narrative?

Had to cut off at week 16, because data for week 17 of 2020 isn't fully compiled according to the CDC website.

lol, no I didn't. Just because you don't like how polls are conducted, doesn't make them invalid. You have not made any kind of a point other than to show us all how delusional you are. Covid-19 is real. You can scream its not as much as you want, no one believes you.

I think its funnier that one party is saying "Its perfectly safe, I will bet your life on it."

Compared to flu this one mutates slowly.

Believing in science seems to be.

The protesters aren't republicans. They are Nazis. They fly the freaking flag. They just vote republican.

If you have some studies on how it works, please link them. I'd be legitimately interested in reading them.

There's no way to prove who you're polling online without getting their actual personal information which they didn't do. They're asking Hindu Indians and Nigerian Princes what they think about the economy on Yahoo comment section and you're quoting it like gospel, this argument is over. Best of luck kid

Hey if that means your done posting your covid denials, good riddance.

You dont need a "study" to understand how a drug works. Its an immune suppressant. Its currently believed it might be a possible use when your immune system is doing more harm to you than good. Even then, it might not be an optimal option, and even using it might not solve the issue, because just because you stopped your body from killing you doesnt mean you no longer have a respiratory infection *** up your lungs... and anything that attacks your lungs or heart affects everything, given everything relies on blood being delivered.

Youre looking at data with no context. "This study says people who are on this drug are less likely to have covid" does not equate to a conclusion of "this drug is effective against covid". Thats a correlation. Doesnt mean its a causation. You need to test the drug itself on patients with covid and isolate other variables to actually get meaningful data, else it could just be a flaw in data elsewhere, such as maybe they didnt go out. They could have just not been in contact with anyone with covid yet.

Either way, this is unlikely to be a miracle cure. Its unlikely to affect the virus itself, just treat one problem that shows up when you are infected with it. You still need to deal with the virus itself.

Also, this goes without saying for everyone else: This is not how polls are conducted. Polls are open to scrutiny, but not like this.

We had an Italian doctor actually posting on this matter earlier in this thread, but its buried.

Sure kid.

When I said rural areas are different from urban ones, you thought I said rural areas were unaffected.
When I said we need to fix the supply chain or we'll starve, you claimed I said we were lacking supply.
Sorry, but I don't trust your reading comprehension. Just because you think HQC only works on cytokine storms, doesn't mean any doctor ever actually said that.
I want a study I can look over. I want to be able to see who funded the study and search for conflicts of interest. This wall of text you wrote is meaningless. Post the links you got your info from or don't bother replying.

.... My reading comprehension is fine. You are either terrible at trying to state your point effectively, as those are reasonable conclusions from what you were saying in the context they were used, or youre trying to re-imagine what you stated with new information that was presented to you.

At best your only defense has been semantics.

Page 104
I didn't say rural areas were unaffected. I didn't say everything needs to reopen. I didn't say we were short on supply. You assumed I said those things.
So again, provide studies on how HQC works since I'm apparently so wrong. But you can't ask me to take your word for it.

Sadly as we were arguing earlier it seems CBS was literally exposed by Project Veritas for staging fake covid 19 testing at the hospital for CBS Morning show but reported it as real, They actually faked testing patients for covid 19 and got caught lol. Cant even make this up, 3 hours ago they dropped this bombshell, Its happening




Edit: If you can get behind that ugly paywall from the washington post then heres their word on it,

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/06/cbs-news-edits-testing-story-after-project-veritas-exposes-clinics-line-stuffing-ploy/%3foutputType=amp


thats a credible news organization to alot of news enthusiasts

Project Veritas, why am I not surprised?

you're just coping at this point, you look like neo when he throws up after finding out what the matrix is

Sure kid.

Had to look up what Project Veritas was. Makes sense that someone reading that ***would deny the covid-19 pandemic existing.

Casually ignores the fact The Washington Post reported that CBS removed the literal facts I don't like and the story is true

You guys are trolling me i think, your own favorite news (prob idk) outlet is saying CBS is facts I don't like

Surprising absolutely no one at this point. Next is InfoWars. Gotta disprove the existence of covid at all costs.

Project Veritus is undeniably partisan and they have been guilty of deceitful editing. That being said, when they produce verbatim, uncut video it doesn’t mean it never happened. There’s an art to finding the diamonds in the crap pile, and even the worst sources have them on occasion.

I just came across this and am posting it here as it relates to the thread in a small way.

Disclaimer: I understand that screenshots of tweets don't count as "news" or "facts". I am in no way intending to start a fight/argument/debate. Read it. Take what you will from it. Move on with life. May the odds be ever in your favor.

Some of those are more accurate than others!