Random Politics & Religion #23 (Fake News)

If there was evidence, I can guarantee you'd argue about it being fake or planted or something. I also doubt you'll eat your hat but if you do, will it be a MAGA hat?

That's because it would be "evidence".

Who would not be skeptical of these claims after the media has cried wolf to the point of nausea. It's sad.

The "blind faith" catagorey belongs to those who are still holding out for Trump's presidency to be somehow illegitimate.

If there was evidence, I can guarantee you'd argue about it being fake or planted or something. I also doubt you'll eat your hat but if you do, will it be a MAGA hat?

The "blind faith" category includes a bit of both sides tbh.

*no*

Blind faith is entirely in the liberal camp right now, their still suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and can't cope with a world where Trump is President. Republicans absolutely hate having Trump as President but have resigned to the fact that their stuck with him. The guy sucks as a President, and this is what America gets when both sides are so full of their own ***they can't see over the edge of the pile.

You instantly think every report against Trump is false more than most liberals​ instantly think it's true.

This is funny to me.

In a brief statement in front of the White House, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster described the Post's story as "false."

"The president and the foreign minister reviewed a range of common threats to our two countries, including threats to civil aviation," McMaster said. "At no time, at no time, were intelligence sources or methods discussed, and the president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publicly known."

McMaster's statement echoed earlier denials issued by two other administration officials who attended the meeting.

"This story is false. The president only discussed the common threats that both countries faced," said Dina Powell, deputy national security adviser for strategy.
In addition, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Trump and Lavrov "did not discuss sources, methods or military operations."

McMaster said the statements by Powell and Tillerson "should outweigh [the accounts] of anonymous sources [in the Post report].

"I was in the room," McMaster concluded. "It didn't happen."

Its funny to us all. But at least Saevel realizes Trump sucks.

Trump is apparently taping WH conversations, so the only way we will know whether or not he shared intel with the Russians is if he releases the tape. He can run whoever he wants out there to deny the story, no one in this administration has any credibility.

I want Trump to put Gary Coleman in as press secretary.

Whatchu talking about, Willis?

*squints*

Seriously, he could be the press secretary, and answer every media question with that phrase, and still do a better job than Spicer

No he couldn't, he's dead.

Yeah, Trump can say crazy things and (mostly) get away with it, because he's Trump... and because the media as a whole has pretty much lost its mind. The problem is that Trump has surrounded himself with people who are (mostly) relatively normal by comparison, so when one of them (*cough cough Spicer*) screws something up, they don't have Trumplomatic immunity.

That's where Gary Busey comes in. He's normal enough to do the job, and crazy enough that whenever he says something wrong, well, he's Gary freaking Busey so what do you expect?

Former DNC staffer Seth Richlooking like he was probably leaking Hillary's emails to wiki leaks last year before he was murdered.

We need a full investigation into the possibility that Hilary had him killed.

Former DNC staffer Seth Richlooking like he was probably leaking Hillary's emails to wiki leaks last year before he was murdered.

We need a full investigation into the possibility that Hilary had him killed.

Former DNC staffer Seth Richlooking like he was probably leaking Hillary's emails to wiki leaks last year before he was murdered.

We need a full investigation into the possibility that Hilary had him killed.

So, we are back to "Hillary kills her enemies" narrative as a deflection again. At least they are rotating away from Benghazi and taking a side path to emails, so that could be refreshing.