I used to play wow.
But then I took an arrow in the knee.
Pics That Make You LOL |
||
|
Pics that make you LOL
I used to make comments about taking an arrow in the knee but then...it got old.
Ramuh.Rowland said: » That's absolutely amazing. Reminds me a lot of this guy that edited the ROM of Earthbound and had his girlfriend beat it on an emulator so when she got to a certain point, she got a rather special message. The most epic battle evah!..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LjxaK-dVugs
I want a girl who loves Earthbound :(
Fairy.Spence said: » I want a girl who loves I havn't seen this anywhere in here yet but sorry in advance if it is a repost.
Bahamut.Raenryong said: » When you're level four in WoW, you also interact with people unlike Skyrim. Correct. +1 for Skyrim. Multiplayer/social aspects >>> singleplayer. Even if some of the community sucks, you will always find good people.
Is there not a better thread for skyrim debate >.>
Well I'm not going to go into the Skyrim thread and throw loads of negative opinions around because it's borderline trolling.
When Skyrim invades my neutral thread, that is where I stand my ground! Talk about jokes getting old...
Offline
Posts: 20643
Bahamut.Raenryong said: » Multiplayer/social aspects >>> singleplayer. Even if some of the community sucks, you will always find good people. Skyrim singleplayer or Skyrim singleplayer with multiplayer aspects - which is superior?
I wasn't debating singleplayer games vs multiplayer games - just that multiplayer has far more longevity/fun potential than singleplayer. Multiplayer capability and human interaction is a definite positive when comparing any game to Skyrim. Nothing a voice chat on console or Skype can't fix.
There's plenty of single player games out there that are amazing on their own but are even better when you play them with friends. Here's a hilarious example. Oh ***I have a bag of Milky Ways! Concurrent gaming is not the same as a multiplayer component :(
Who cares about your opinions on videogames in lolpics? :(
Bahamut.Raenryong said: » Concurrent gaming is not the same as a multiplayer component :( Depends on what aspect of multiplayer you partake in. Many are subjective to the game or how you engage it. For example, Call of Duty is plagued with angry, racist, sailor mouthed pubescent 12 year olds that are more or less random skirmishes and e-peen contests as to who can kill whom the most and quickest; yet at the same time, having a group of friends form a group or clan and organize teamwork and stratagize can make for fun tactful action in say Battlefield 3. Not to say any are exempt of the former, but your idea of multiplayer seems to pertain mostly to MMOs since that is the only genre that really lets you meet up and engage in a task together more so than any co-op or multiplayer FPS. But enough of my ramblings. This is after all a LOL thread. Contribute moar, whine less~ At least post some lols so we don't have another half page of skyrim/single player vs multiplayer debate
Caption for this was "Go on, tell a lie." Artemicion said: » Bahamut.Raenryong said: » Concurrent gaming is not the same as a multiplayer component :( Depends on what aspect of multiplayer you partake in. Many are subjective to the game or how you engage it. For example, Call of Duty is plagued with angry, racist, sailor mouthed pubescent 12 year olds; yet at the same time, having a group of friends form a group or clan and organize teamwork and stratagize can make for fun tactful action in say Battlefield 3. Not to say any are exempt of the former, but your idea of multiplayer seems to pertain mostly to MMOs since that is the only genre that really lets you meet up and engage in a task together more so than any co-op or multiplayer FPS. EVERY game is plagued by a negative aspect. Every activity in every walk of life is plagued by a negative aspect. It is always about meeting good people and having fun; this can happen in CoD/Battlefield/MMOs/fighting games/whatever! Multiplayer aspects, implemented well, tend to give a game a massive lifespan as they add an element of "human chaos" to a game, different from playing with scripted encounters or NPCs for a lifetime. Think of the lifespan of MMOs/FPSs/whatever. Will Skyrim last that long? Will you still be playing it in months to come? this made me giggle
Take the debate elsewhere.
Stop having Skyrim and its shitty arrow in knee unfunny memes and smugly attacking other games appear and there is no need to disagree!
|
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|