Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
|
Random Politics & Religion #00
Why is it that every post of Saevel is filled with paranoia?
Today they vaccinate you tomorrow they lock you up!! Dude..lol. Shiva.Viciousss said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Also, I'm asking a serious question about solutions to the "anti-vax" problem. Anyone with reasonable ideas, besides the obvious 2? Increase the penalties for child endangerment and wrongful death. If you let your kid die from meningitis, a treatable disease, the penalty should be a lot more than 5 years. I know thats in Canada but still. That's a 2 to 20 year prison sentence and a fine up to $10,000. I think there's room for discussion on making it a 1st degree felony though. That's up to 99 years of jailtime. A child is defenseless, their only hope of recovering from an illness is their parents, whether it is a cough or meningitis. Letting the child die because of personal reasons like "God" should carry a lot more than a minimum sentence of 2 years imo. Like I said before, anti-vax parents have to have their child vaccinated for their child to be accepted to public schools (and most private schools, if the ratio is the same in the nation as it is in Texas). If the anti-vax parent is too lazy or stupid to educate themselves, why should we believe that they will educate their children themselves? You are pulling one incident that happened in Canada to the extreme. I didn't say arrest people for an ideal. I said if you let your kid continue on being sick, and possibly even die, there should be a harsh punishment for it. That's just for child endangerment with a risk of death. If the child dies, that's child manslaughter, and (in Texas) could lead to the death penalty. But like I said, you cannot arrest people for having an ideal. If the child becomes sick and the parent neglects the treatment, that's the 2nd degree felony right there. If the child dies, that's a capital felony on top of that. The punishments are strict enough, could be stricter if the child survives (bump it up to a 1st degree felony). Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Asura.Saevel said: » So the "for your own good" or "for my own good" arguments can never be used as justification for preemptively depriving someone of their free will. Until the day your free will effectively kills someone. You are more likely to get killed in a car wreck than to die from a preventable disease. And people kill each other with vehicles due to their "free will" also. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Asura.Saevel said: » So the "for your own good" or "for my own good" arguments can never be used as justification for preemptively depriving someone of their free will. Until the day your free will effectively kills someone. You are more likely to get killed in a car wreck than to die from a preventable disease. And people kill each other with vehicles due to their "free will" also. Which is why I maintain as soon as self-driving cars become 1) feasible across the board and 2) are proved to reduce deaths and serious injuries that people-driven cars, they be given the keys. At least, in theory. Meh. As it stands, w/e. Gotta die somehow I guess. I just think preventable deaths from diseases because "zomg fear of vaccines" are some of the biggest tragedies out there. Drama Torama said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » You're life is not in any real measurable danger because the person next to you didn't get/doesn't have a particular vaccine. That is just asinine. If they ACTUALLY had the measles or small pox or whatever, your life would arguably be in some amount of danger. Not having the measles and not having the measles vaccine are not the same thing. It's stupid to treat them as if they are. Forced injections at the barrel of a gun (your words a few pages ago) for diseases people don't even have are not part of any civilized social contract. Especially when the rules seemingly don't apply to the massive flux of people illegally running across the boarders. You want to talk about risk, the risk of measles ultimately doesn't come from your crazy neighbor who chooses not to vaccinate because she has a problem with risk assessment. It comes from the lot of illegals rushing across the borders. But of course that doesn't fit the narratives of hating on the "right" people. We don't want to do anything about the infected people coming into the country, so instead we'll just ***on the people next to us who make different choices. Okay, you clearly don't know what herd immunity is, or how any of this works. Feel free to educate yourself, there's an awful lot of research out there to choose from, and the good news is that it all says basically the same thing. Illegal immigration is an entirely separate problem, but here's the thing; even if they WERE the source of the measles/whatever, THE SPREAD OF IT IS STILL STOPPED BY HAVING AS MANY PEOPLE IMMUNIZED AS POSSIBLE. Vaccines aren't 100% defense, but a large population, with as many immunized as possible, is what limits the damage, and protects the immunocompromised - the elderly, newborns, people with reactions to vaccines. Your idiocy and ignorance puts those people at risk. And if you would rather ignore that, and endanger those people, to make a weak talking point against a completely unrelated problem, then *** you. I'm quite familiar with the concept of 'herd immunity". Despite that, there still are some risks to getting vaccinated. A vaccine, like any medicine, is capable of causing serious problems. We're ultimately not arguing that the risk of not vaccinating is greater than the risk of vaccinating. We really are both on board with that. I'm arguing that you don't get to make that assessment for everyone else, and that people should make it for themselves. *** you for thinking people shouldn't have that freedom. Caitsith.Shiroi said: » We are talking about something that spreads and spreads really fast. Your retort of "until your free will kills somebody" is weak because our free will have been killing people ever since humans existed. You can't apply a broad retort on a specific cause and expect people to not counter it. Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Caitsith.Shiroi said: » We are talking about something that spreads and spreads really fast. Your retort of "until your free will kills somebody" is weak because our free will have been killing people ever since humans existed. You can't apply a broad retort on a specific cause and expect people to not counter it. There's no vaccine for car accidents. Sure there is, make them (cars) so expensive that no one can afford them. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Caitsith.Shiroi said: » We are talking about something that spreads and spreads really fast. Your retort of "until your free will kills somebody" is weak because our free will have been killing people ever since humans existed. You can't apply a broad retort on a specific cause and expect people to not counter it. I'm not even sure they're capable of understanding the greater concept you're hinting at. They think their intentions are painfully benevolent and could never be anything but. Truly the pigs from animal farm. Caitsith.Shiroi said: » There's no vaccine for car accidents. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Also, I'm asking a serious question about solutions to the "anti-vax" problem. Anyone with reasonable ideas, besides the obvious 2? I don't think there is a proper solution where everyone is happy. Some countries make it mandatory to be vaccinated to go to school. Idaho doesn't require them. Shiva.Viciousss said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Also, I'm asking a serious question about solutions to the "anti-vax" problem. Anyone with reasonable ideas, besides the obvious 2? Increase the penalties for child endangerment and wrongful death. If you let your kid die from meningitis, a treatable disease, the penalty should be a lot more than 5 years. I know thats in Canada but still. That's a 2 to 20 year prison sentence and a fine up to $10,000. I think there's room for discussion on making it a 1st degree felony though. That's up to 99 years of jailtime. Idaho Defends Crucial Parental Right To Let Own Kids Die For Funsies Wonkette. You have been warned. Did nausi really just call us all pigs?
Garuda.Chanti said: » Idaho doesn't require them. Garuda.Chanti said: » In Idaho and five other states it is perfectly legal to let your child die because religion. Idaho Defends Crucial Parental Right To Let Own Kids Die For Funsies Wonkette. You have been warned. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Garuda.Chanti said: » In Idaho and five other states it is perfectly legal to let your child die because religion. Idaho Defends Crucial Parental Right To Let Own Kids Die For Funsies Wonkette. You have been warned. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Truly the pigs from animal farm. You might align politically with many posters here, but you're own unique case as in every single one of your stances stems from fear. Dude you're afraid of *** everything and everyone, so much that I'm surprised you even manage to leave your house without being scared shitless. If bunker jokes are thrown at you and you alone here there is a reason. Well that's pretty personal.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I'm not even sure they're capable of understanding the greater concept you're hinting at. They think their intentions are painfully benevolent and could never be anything but. Truly the pigs from animal farm. And now, you're going to take a little break. [Edit: and that means no more piling on him, too.] Everyone who disagrees with you is cattle(to be generous), but calling you scaredy-cat is too much. Ok.
Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Don't drink and drive™ Changing to a topic we all care about deeply.
Had a beer called Loose Canon last night. Good stuff. I just said don't drink and drive™!
Didn't you see the ™??? Never heard of that, though it'd be cool to drink a pirate themed beer. Is it blonde? I only like those, dark beers are too sour for my taste.
Asura.Kingnobody said: » I just said don't drink and drive™! Didn't you see the ™??? I only drink in the comfort of my own home or when there's a designated driver that isn't me. Nuts to you. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » My cat's breath smells like cat food. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Never heard of that, though it'd be cool to drink a pirate themed beer. Is it blonde? I only like those, dark beers are too sour for my taste. Narp. It's an IPA. Which is about as sour as beer comes most of the time, though this one has a nice citrusy flavor that takes some of the sour bite out of it. Edit: There are a lot of pirate-themed beers out there though. Finally bought my house, so once things are moved in I'll be buying a fridge for the garage specifically for beer. I'll see what I can find that may be of interest. Though I don't know if such microbrews would even be available on your side of the Ocean. ; |
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|