Random Politics & Religion #13
Random Politics & Religion #13
Italy is sending soldiers to Latvia, which makes no *** sense and just increases the tension of this stupid cold war with Russia.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
3, social conservative - economically liberal,
Didn't say they would be good at anything, but without the duopoly its a natural alignment.
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
If you want to use Trump's words against him, then don't *** when people use Clinton's actions against her.
What's worse in your eyes: What somebody said they did to another, bragging what they did, with no evidence showing that they did it, or what somebody actually did that greatly effects their capability to hold national secrets that could not only damage our reputation, but possibly even destroy our efforts overseas, like in Syria or Libya?
I'm not stupid to believe that, whoever hacks into Clinton's email server while she is president will get nuke launch codes or something similar, but they can do some real damage with that level of confidential information that Clinton "doesn't know" is confidential....
Clinton is a danger to our society far more than Trump's words can ever be, and you have to be too stupid, or too far gone in her rhetoric, to be blind to that fact.
What's worse in your eyes: What somebody said they did to another, bragging what they did, with no evidence showing that they did it, or what somebody actually did that greatly effects their capability to hold national secrets that could not only damage our reputation, but possibly even destroy our efforts overseas, like in Syria or Libya?
I'm not stupid to believe that, whoever hacks into Clinton's email server while she is president will get nuke launch codes or something similar, but they can do some real damage with that level of confidential information that Clinton "doesn't know" is confidential....
Clinton is a danger to our society far more than Trump's words can ever be, and you have to be too stupid, or too far gone in her rhetoric, to be blind to that fact.
This is just comedy like fearmongering. Clinton's former email server will have no affect on her ability to be President. Her former email server is not a danger to our society. I'm guessing she won't ever send an email as President. Thats what aides are for. How many emails do you think Obama sends out daily? I'm guessing none.
Got some bad news for you! It's been confirmed that Obama sent emails to Clinton's private server under an alias, lulz. He's sent emails, so has she. It's a SIGNIFICANT issue in her being President. They're all expected to drop the first of November hopefully. We'll see how things go then ;)
Caitsith.Mahayaya said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
If you want to use Trump's words against him, then don't *** when people use Clinton's actions against her.
What's worse in your eyes: What somebody said they did to another, bragging what they did, with no evidence showing that they did it, or what somebody actually did that greatly effects their capability to hold national secrets that could not only damage our reputation, but possibly even destroy our efforts overseas, like in Syria or Libya?
I'm not stupid to believe that, whoever hacks into Clinton's email server while she is president will get nuke launch codes or something similar, but they can do some real damage with that level of confidential information that Clinton "doesn't know" is confidential....
Clinton is a danger to our society far more than Trump's words can ever be, and you have to be too stupid, or too far gone in her rhetoric, to be blind to that fact.
What's worse in your eyes: What somebody said they did to another, bragging what they did, with no evidence showing that they did it, or what somebody actually did that greatly effects their capability to hold national secrets that could not only damage our reputation, but possibly even destroy our efforts overseas, like in Syria or Libya?
I'm not stupid to believe that, whoever hacks into Clinton's email server while she is president will get nuke launch codes or something similar, but they can do some real damage with that level of confidential information that Clinton "doesn't know" is confidential....
Clinton is a danger to our society far more than Trump's words can ever be, and you have to be too stupid, or too far gone in her rhetoric, to be blind to that fact.
This is just comedy like fearmongering. Clinton's former email server will have no affect on her ability to be President. Her former email server is not a danger to our society. I'm guessing she won't ever send an email as President. Thats what aides are for. How many emails do you think Obama sends out daily? I'm guessing none.
Got some bad news for you! It's been confirmed that Obama sent emails to Clinton's private server under an alias, lulz. He's sent emails, so has she. It's a SIGNIFICANT issue in her being President. They're all expected to drop the first of November hopefully. We'll see how things go then ;)
[+]
Uh, we've known the President sent her emails for over a year. Is the use of a pseudonym supposed to mean something?
Then why did you like this post on the last page when the majority of it was completely bogus?
Quote:
This is just comedy like fearmongering. Clinton's former email server will have no affect on her ability to be President. Her former email server is not a danger to our society. I'm guessing she won't ever send an email as President. Thats what aides are for. How many emails do you think Obama sends out daily? I'm guessing none.
[+]
Because it was comedic fearmongering. And not even remotely realistic.
[+]
So despite being smug and gloating about knowing about that for over a year, you don't bother to let him know he's full of ***because that won't exactly help the case against Trump, eh?
I'm just a fan of truth, and with Hillary and many of her supporters there seems to be quite a drought of it.
I'm just a fan of truth, and with Hillary and many of her supporters there seems to be quite a drought of it.
[+]
It was in your own link. People really need to read their own links. Beginning to end. Not just headlines.
It has nothing to do with Trump. A hacker isn't going to steal nuclear launch codes of some fictional unsecured server. It's cheesy and ridiculous. Obama sending emails doesn't make it any less so.
It has nothing to do with Trump. A hacker isn't going to steal nuclear launch codes of some fictional unsecured server. It's cheesy and ridiculous. Obama sending emails doesn't make it any less so.
[+]
Come on people now smile on your brother get to get together try to love one another right now...
YouTube Video Placeholder
Candlejack said: »
Lack of a conviction just means he wasn't found guilty. It doesn't discredit any evidence used in the trial, nor does it discredit his own sordid and adulterous history. Remember, he held a presser with Marla Maples, his then-mistress, at his side shortly after his divorce from Ivana.
I was referring to Hillary... but thanks for making my case for me?
[+]
What case? I never implied no conviction meant no evidence. The judicial process works the other way around.
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
Italy is sending soldiers to Latvia, which makes no *** sense and just increases the tension of this stupid cold war with Russia.
That's because this "cold war" with Russia is going to get really hot when Hillary is President. War is all she knows. It is her one solution to everything, that and stupid reset buttons. She is turning hacked e-mails into a huge international incident with Russia to distract from the content. That is unstable and irresponsible. She views a willingness to speak to Putin as cuddling up to him.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Uh, we've known the President sent her emails for over a year. Is the use of a pseudonym supposed to mean something?
It means the republicans can justify spending at LEAST $100m investigating it.
That's 100m taxpayer $ for partizan political purposes. And 100m taxpayer $ that can't be spent on social services.
WIN WIN!!! For the GOP if not for thee and me.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
What case? I never implied no conviction meant no evidence. The judicial process works the other way around.
Uh, this:
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
The call for evidence from people who are still convinced Hillary broke federal law, sold access to the State department, and tormented her husband's accusers is cute.
There is evidence for all of this. There is none for Trump's accusers.
[+]
Glad nobody got hurt by these lunatics. Enjoy life in prison.
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
What case? I never implied no conviction meant no evidence. The judicial process works the other way around.
Uh, this:
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
The call for evidence from people who are still convinced Hillary broke federal law, sold access to the State department, and tormented her husband's accusers is cute.
There is evidence for all of this. There is none for Trump's accusers.
So much gaslighting by the media in this election.
YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
What case? I never implied no conviction meant no evidence. The judicial process works the other way around.
Uh, this:
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
The call for evidence from people who are still convinced Hillary broke federal law, sold access to the State department, and tormented her husband's accusers is cute.
There is evidence for all of this. There is none for Trump's accusers.
Do you know why there is no prosecution? Latest developments stated that this was ordered from the top. Meaning Lynch and/or Obama (most likely both).
So, guess what! Clinton knowingly broke the law, everyone (but the deniers, like you) knows she broke the law, and she is getting a pass from being treated like everyone else who broke the law by the President. That's not how it works, you are supposed to be found guilty before the President can issue pardons on criminals, not the other way around!
CIA preparing cyber attack against Russia
Biden himself made the public threat, and from Russia they are not pleased. Spokeperson from the Cremlin said "USA is playing with fire" and that "no attack will be left unpunished".
Nuts.
Biden himself made the public threat, and from Russia they are not pleased. Spokeperson from the Cremlin said "USA is playing with fire" and that "no attack will be left unpunished".
Nuts.
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
CIA preparing cyber attack against Russia
Biden himself made the public threat, and from Russia they are not pleased. Spokeperson from the Cremlin said "USA is playing with fire" and that "no attack will be left unpunished".
Nuts.
Biden himself made the public threat, and from Russia they are not pleased. Spokeperson from the Cremlin said "USA is playing with fire" and that "no attack will be left unpunished".
Nuts.
[+]
Candlejack said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
What case? I never implied no conviction meant no evidence. The judicial process works the other way around.
Uh, this:
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
The call for evidence from people who are still convinced Hillary broke federal law, sold access to the State department, and tormented her husband's accusers is cute.
There is evidence for all of this. There is none for Trump's accusers.
Cheating on your wife does not imply evidence for sexual assault. You'd make a terrible prosecutor, and you're actively throwing Bill under the bus too. Do you understand how anything works?
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Candlejack said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
What case? I never implied no conviction meant no evidence. The judicial process works the other way around.
Uh, this:
Cerberus.Pleebo said: »
The call for evidence from people who are still convinced Hillary broke federal law, sold access to the State department, and tormented her husband's accusers is cute.
There is evidence for all of this. There is none for Trump's accusers.
Cheating on your wife does not imply evidence for sexual assault. You'd make a terrible prosecutor, and you're actively throwing Bill under the bus too. Do you understand how anything works?
YouTube Video Placeholder
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.